I've been trying to figure out how I missed Paul Tough's The Inequality Machine until now.
The book is such a lucid, compelling, and tightly argued critique of elite higher ed that you'd think it would have made a big splash. If you are like me and have missed The Inequality Machine until now, please rectify that situation. This is a book that we need to talk about.
The reason that I did not find The Inequality Machine until now are, I think, three-fold.
First, the audiobook version was only released in March of this year. There is a much higher probability that I will read a book with an audiobook version than without. Increasingly, I'll favor books that are audio/e-book synched (Whispersync) over those lacking that option.
Second, and somewhat confusingly, the book's title changed for the paperback release (also in March) from The Years That Matter Most: How College Makes or Breaks Us to its current (much better) title.
And third, well…COVID. We've all been a bit distracted. Book recommendations are shared by word-of-mouth. We've not all been together enough to share what we are reading.
If anything, the themes discussed and conclusions reached in The Inequality Machine are more relevant than ever. 19-months or so into the pandemic, the structural inequalities that at least in part define our higher education system have only grown more pronounced.
Tough's main conclusion about US higher education will not surprise anyone who is a student of our system. Among the claims that Tough levels about higher education are:
Colleges and universities are financed and designed in ways that benefit mostly those with the most resources.
Elite higher education, comprised of the wealthiest institutions, educates the smallest number and proportion of low-income students.
The SAT and ACT have very little predictive value above students' high school grades in predicting college success. At the same time, these tests do an excellent job increasing barriers to admission for poor kids while advantaging students from families with the resources to pay for private tutoring.
Research-intensive colleges and universities have done a poor job of providing disadvantaged students with the necessary resources to succeed in STEM courses.
The trend towards state disinvestment in public institutions has hollowed out the ability of many colleges and universities to provide the necessary resources to enable students to get to graduation while also shifting the financial burden of higher education from the public to students and their families.
Throughout The Inequality Machine, Tough illuminates the costs of our higher education system on the lives of individual students and their families. The college-going experiences of immigrant, first-generation, minority, and low-income students are described from their perspectives.
Tough's insistence on having those most disadvantaged by the higher education system speak for themselves gives the book an emotional resonance.
As good as The Inequality Machine is — and it is very good — I would have liked if Tough could have spent more time on potential solutions.
The chapter on one professor's efforts to re-imagine calculus instruction at UT-Austin is inspiring. What is missing is a discussion of the widespread efforts across many colleges and universities to re-invent a range of foundational and gateway courses. (A trend that Eddie Maloney and I discuss in Learning Innovation and the Future of Higher Education).
While strong critiques of our system of higher education from outside the academy are both needed and welcome, Tough could have perhaps done more to connect with those of us working to make changes from within. We need to recognize and amplify the work of colleges and university leaders working to make institution-wide changes to lower costs, advance learning, and improve student success.
To be fair, Tough does highlight some institution-level reforms, from schools as diverse as Trinity College and U-T Austen. While I would have liked to have seen more case studies of colleges and universities tackling structural inequalities, the examples provided in The Inequality Machine should be discussed (and perhaps replicated) broadly across our ecosystem.
What are you reading?
Show on Jobs site: Disable left side advertisement?: Is this diversity newsletter?: Is this Career Advice newsletter?: Advice Newsletter publication dates: Sunday, October 17, 2021Diversity Newsletter publication date: Sunday, October 17, 2021Trending:
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.