Randy Johnson claimed he kept a bag of baseballs by his bed to throw at home invaders
His quote threw a hell of a wrench into a story about athletes owning guns.
Today I’d like to talk about Randy Johnson and his fastball, but also about the challenges of sports reporting.
In the course of researching Secret Base videos, I read a lot of old newspapers, and in doing so stumble across curious old stories and quotes. Sometimes those tidbits become whole videos, sometimes they turn into blog posts on this website, and sometimes we just share them in Slack or on Twitter. I don’t even remember what I was researching when I found this:
This is a magnificent quotation. No context necessary. Randy Johnson, one of the greatest and hardest-throwing pitchers in baseball history, told a reporter in 1995 that he does not own a gun, and that his method of self-defense is keeping a bag of baseballs next to his bed so he can bean intruders. Johnson even recommends that any would-be home invaders wear batting helmets, which is a hilarious image.
And then there’s that poor bird, may it rest in peace.
So, Randy Johnson actually hitting people with baseballs: pretty scary. Randy Johnson choosing to defend his home and family by hitting people with baseballs: pretty funny idea!
But now I must circle back around to the context. We’re gonna get scary again. Sorry. A couple years after finding that quote, enjoying it, and tweeting it, I wondered to myself why Randy Johnson was talking about guns and self defense in the first place.
The original article is harrowing. I cannot find a digital, non-subscription version of the piece, so I will describe it for you. In July of 1995, Seattle Post-Intelligencer reporter Brian Knight reported on the trend of gun ownership among athletes, including some alarming incidents that year, like Seahawks receiver Brian Blades accidentally killing his cousin. Knight lists more accidents like that one, plus instances in which police found firearms while searching pro athletes’ homes or cars. Knight interviewed a sports psychologist and a cop for their hypotheses about why pro athletes might buy guns, and asked pro sports officials about each league’s gun policy. And, as is typical for such a trend piece, Knight also seems to have attended media availability for a local pro team to get some thoughts directly from athletes. It was summer, so only the Mariners were in-season. And Johnson’s goofy quote is the only one Knight published, as the final line of his deeply serious article. Here’s how it looks in context:
Straight-up paragraph about the NFL’s policy on guns, straight-up paragraph about MLB and the NBA lacking policies, straightforward NFL executive quote and then … boom, Randy getting silly. -30-.
Kinda weird, and not even the weirdest application of that quote. As depicted up top, many papers published the Johnson quote in isolation, without context, in their regular round-up of one-liners and soundbites. Nowadays, a reporter might just fire the quote off as a tweet and leave it out of the article.
But any paper that published the quote in context, as the kicker to that article about athletes and guns, faced the question of whether or not to highlight that standout element. For the ones that did, the outcome is pretty jarring. The last screencap I showed you is from the second page of the article as it was syndicated in the July 27, 1995 Lexington Herald-Leader. Their editors chose to use that kicker as a pull-quote on the front sports page, too. Here’s how it looked on page C1:
What the fuck!!!!!!!!! The quote and Randy’s grinning face are just sitting smack in the middle of a sea of text describing manslaughter and suicide. Reporters these days worry about one odd element of an article getting re-published out of context by “aggregator” websites or social media users, which can warp an item’s intended weight and meaning. I guess this is the 1995 version of that.
What have we learned today? Well, I think it’s the following: Newspaper formatting can be scary, but not as scary as Randy Johnson fastballs, which are scary, but not as scary as guns. Thank you for your time.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.